This Budgeting Rule Worked in 2015 — 3 Experts Say It Falls Short Today
In 2015, the 50/30/20 rule was one of the most well-recognized and practical ways to budget. Popularized by U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren and her daughter, Amelia Warren, the method calls for allocating 50% of after-tax income to needs, 30% to wants, and 20% to savings and debt repayment.
But a lot has changed in the past decade. Here’s why three financial experts say the 50/30/20 rule may not work as well today.
Get Started: 3 Money Rules for Beginners That Actually Add Up to Real Wealth
Be Savvy: How Middle-Class Earners Are Quietly Becoming Millionaires — and How You Can, Too
Needs Can Exceed 50% of Income
Steve Sexton, CEO of Sexton Advisory Group, said the 50% bucket for necessities has become increasingly difficult to maintain. He said that housing alone can take up a substantial portion of someone’s income, especially renters, recent homebuyers or people living in higher-cost markets. According to Sexton, in the first quarter of 2026, a median-income family buying a median-priced home would have needed about 32% of its income just for the mortgage payment.
He said that once expenses for groceries, utilities, transportation, insurance and healthcare are added in, many families have spent well past 50% of their income before they’ve spent any money on wants. Not only that, Sexton said that families with young children often have to pay an enormous amount each month for childcare.
“Federal Reserve data show that families paying for both housing and childcare had a median childcare payment of $1,083 per month, and it was even higher for families using 20 or more hours of paid care each week," he said.
Higher Earners May Be Able To Save Much More Than 20%
Andy Esser, certified financial planner and financial advisor at Edward Jones, said that while inflation has been persistent and things cost more in general, many households are enjoying greater income than ever. He said that those households may find it easy to meet their needs with far less than 50% of their earnings, and that spending even 30% on wants might be gratuitous.
“With changing economic conditions, household structures and financial goals, 50/30/20 doesn't always inspire these households to invest their surplus, to contemplate charitable giving or to account for taxes,” he said.
Irregular Income Doesn’t Align With the Rule
Barry Nussbaum, owner and senior lawyer at Nussbaum Law, said there’s a structural problem with the 50/30/20 rule. He said that the rule assumes a predictable paycheck that comes with a conventional office job, which doesn’t really match how people actually earn anymore.
“Not when there is freelance work, gig income, and two-earner households that split irregular pay, none of which fit into neat little boxes of 50, 30, and 20 when the income itself changes month to month,” he said.
This article was provided by MoneyLion.com for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, legal or tax advice.
More From MoneyLion: